Alternative to Multiple IF Statements

Have you ever had to create a multiple IF statement? Ever notice how crazy it looks with all those parentheses and it’s difficult to follow? Well, I was wondering if there was another way I could create a multiple IF statements that would be cleaner and easier to edit if need be.

And I have.

What I have discovered isn’t exactly as powerful as an IF statement, however, this does give you an alternative way to create a big IF statement if you need to match exact values.

Too many IFs

Technically, I haven’t actually determined all the possibilities of this technique, but what I do know is that if you have a nested IF statement that does a basic 1-to-1 comparison, this is a pretty interesting and clean alternative than using a lot of IF statements.

Just to be clear:

So far, I found that this works best for exact matching in an IF statement

My Opinion

IF Statement the Regular Way

Here’s an example. Say you had the following requirements:

Data Desired Output
Yes Definitely
No Certainly Not
Maybe Eh

A pretty standard IF formula to take the data and transform it to the desired output would be:

=IF(A1="Yes","Definitely",IF(A1="No","Certainly Not",IF(A1="Maybe","Eh")))

This works fine, but notice how A1 is repeated? What if you had to change that? You would have to change that in multiple places, which isn’t so bad for this particular case. However, have you ever had a complicated INDEX+MATCH function? Let’s look at another example. Say I have the data:

Person Response
Joseph Yes
John Maybe
Meredith No
more names more responses

I want to look up a person’s response using an INDEX+MATCH function. I would use something like:


Assuming that the desired lookup_value is in D2 like the image below:

Multiple IF statements example

Now I’d like to transform that “Yes” to “Definitely” and the other responses to “Certainly Not” and “Eh” as before. The formula would look like:

=IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)="Yes","Definitely", IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)="Maybe","Eh", IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)="No","Certainly Not")))

Not so pretty. It’s a bit complicated and not so easy to follow if you look at the formula bar in Excel with this formula. Plus, if you have to change the INDEX formula, you have to change it in 3 spots (something that has always irked me – as a developer, you try to not repeat any code if you can help it).

So, how can I make this cleaner?

Alternative to Multiple IF Statements

This is a little unorthodox, but it’s pretty neat for something like this.

Use INDEX and MATCH with array constants to map the matching values to the desired results

My Opinion, again

If you’re not familiar with a array constants, it’s pretty simple. Using the curly braces { and }, you can create the array constants of data. In the case of the INDEX and MATCH functions, they actually accept array parameters, so you can either give it a Range (this is usually the case), or you can use these curly braces to create array constants. John Walkenbach wrote a nice piece on the subject. Please have a look if you would like more info.

Here’s the format:

=INDEX({desired results}, MATCH(lookup_value, {values to compare},0))

Item Explanation
desired results This would be the list of "Definitely," "Certainly Not," and "Eh"
lookup_value Surprisingly, this would be the main INDEX+MATCH formula that we had to repeat in the multiple if statements earlier. Basically, this part of the formula is what will get evaluated, much like the first parameter in an IF statement.
values to compare These would be the "Yes," "No," and "Maybe" list

Putting this together we now have the following formula:

=INDEX({"Definitely","Certainly Not","Eh"},MATCH( INDEX($A$1:$B$4,MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2), {"Yes","No","Maybe"},0))

I did say that it would be a little unorthodox 🙂 but check it out! You only have to write the main INDEX+MATCH function one time, and you don’t have a bazillion parentheses. Awesome.

Now, I know that this is a very simple example, but it’s only to illustrate the point.

How this Works

In order to get this to work right, you have to follow 3 rules:

  1. The array constants {"Definitely","Certainly Not","Eh"} must match the desired outputs array constants {"Yes","No","Maybe"}. Since “Definitely” is in the first spot, it matches to “Yes.” This is crucial to making sure you get the desired output correct.
  2. The first parameter in MATCH must contain a value that is found in the INDEX array constant.
  3. You must wear cool sunglasses and eat a turkey sandwich

Well, ok, you only need the first 2 rules, but you get it 🙂

Let’s look at the function from E2 below:

Awesome alternative

The formula starts off with the INDEX function *inside* of the MATCH function. It finds “Joseph” and moves over one cell to find “Yes”

=INDEX({"Definitely","Certainly Not","Eh"},MATCH("Yes", {"Yes","No","Maybe"},0))

The “Yes” matches with the first “Yes” in the array constant, and so it will return 1 because MATCH will return a row number of what it finds.

=INDEX({"Definitely","Certainly Not","Eh"},1)

The row number 1 in the INDEX function will match up with the “Definitely” item in the array constant of INDEX, which will then return “Definitely”


This results in the desired result of “Definitely.”

Granted, you technically could use Ranges instead of the array constants, however, I wanted to illustrate it this way for two reasons:

  1. It’s a little simpler this way both in teaching and in practice
  2. I don’t always agree with creating an entire worksheet just to hold a simple list like this

However, if these lists were very big, then I would encourage maintaining named ranges for them so the formulas are much cleaner.


Well, that’s it. I hope you found this info unique and interesting 🙂 Until we meet again!

Are you ready to master Excel Dashboards?

Learn Excel Dashboard Course Power BI Webinar

Still not convinced? Check out my review of the course!

  • Michael

    the alternative is great. however, it doesn’t solve a problem where a condition needs to be true before implementing another if. as such it is not a logical and or logical or problem. it is a sequence problem
    an example will be:

    this example deals with x first, then if true, moves to y
    however, your example will fit in a logical and where it tests all the conditions. which is an alternative to

    in the first example, it is pointless to put the constants in array for the purpose of shortening the code…
    but your alternative is very good.

  • Greg Stemler

    I don’t know why you don’t just use a vlookup. It seems really silly to hard code one of the arrays into the formula, while having the other in a spreadsheet column.
    Place the Data and Desired Output on Sheet 2.
    Place Person and Response on Sheet 1, and add in Column C: =VLOOKUP($B2,Sheet2!$A$2:$B$4,2,FALSE)

    • Joseph

      hi Greg,
      I wrote this post some time ago and after reading your comment and thinking about it, I have to agree that this method isn’t the best.

      If we take my example in the post:

      =IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)=”Yes”,”Definitely”, IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)=”Maybe”,”Eh”, IF(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2)=”No”,”Certainly Not”)))

      And use your suggestion, the result would be something like:

      =VLOOKUP(INDEX($A$1:$B$4, MATCH(D2,$A$1:$A$4,0),2),Sheet2!$A2:$B$4,2,FALSE)

      Which I agree, is a nicer solution than the one I ultimately showed. Thanks for pointing that out. I’ll edit the post sometime this week so others can benefit.